In today’s paper, the NY Times called on Governor Andrew Cuomo to veto legislation allowing NYC public schools to let religious organizations to hold worship services on weekends.
The Times opines, “permitting religious services in schools is significantly different. “A worship service is an act of organized religion that consecrates the place in which it is performed, making it a church,” [Federal District Court] Judge Leval wrote. Churches “tend to dominate the schools on the day they use them,” he noted, leading to confusion for children who might believe their school was also a church. The city was also worried that letting the congregation use the school at a subsidized rental rate amounted to public support of religion in violation of the First Amendment.”
The Times ended their OpEd by lecturing the 35 City Council Members supporting a reversal of the ban for playing “politics on the separation of church and state line.”
The Times OpEd is way off-base. If a public school becomes an illegal church when worship services are held, then countless residences across the city and state become illegal churches whenever residents tune into televised worship services. But no one believes that and certainly no child believes that his/her home is a church because grandma or dad watch worship services on TV every Sunday.
Related post: “Bloomberg’s Advancing Secularism”
Is the NY Times right or wrong? Leave your comment below.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks